Research Article Volume 10 Issue 4
Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, University of Nigeria, Nigeria
Correspondence: Okenwa CJ, Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria, Tel +2348035443957
Received: May 01, 2021 | Published: July 2, 2021
Citation: Okenwa CJ, Ukoha PO, Chinyere EC, et al. Quantification and speciation of trac. E amount of vanadium (iii) and vanadium (v) using 2-[(e)-[3-[(e)-(2 hydroxyphenyl) methyleneamino]phenyl]iminomethyl]phenol. J Anal Pharm Res. 2021;10(4):136-145. DOI: 10.15406/japlr.2021.10.00377
Some new transition metal complexes of Vanadium(III) and Vanadium(V) with tetradentate (N2O2) Schiff base – 2-[(E)-[3-[(E)-(2-hydroxyphenyl)methyleneamino]phenyl]iminomethyl]phenol (HPMAPIP) have been synthesized. The characterization of the ligand and the metal complexes were also reported. The bonding and the proposed structure of the newly synthesized complexes were also identified by elemental analysis, Infra red, UV – Vis, 1H NMR, magnetic moment measurements and conductivity analysis. The Metal: Ligand Mole ratio indicated a 1:1 and their wavelength maximum were at 400 and 405 nm for Vanadium (III) and Vanadium(V) complexes respectively. From the calibration curve, Beer’s law was valid for Vanadium (III) and Vanadium (V) between 0.488 – 3.904 ppm. The calibration and analytical sensitivity of Vanadium (III) complex are 0.074 and 0.32 while that of Vanadium (V) are 0.024 and 24 respectively. Optimum pH for the formation of the complex was determined to be 10 and 11 for Vanadium (III) and Vanadium(V) respectively. Very few elements were found to interfere with the method. The method was successfully applied in the determination of Vanadium in alloy steel.
Keywords: spectrophotometry, vanadium, alloy sample
The determination of vanadium has received extensive attention because of its increasing importance in biological and environmental studies. This metal is widely distributed in the earth’s crust but in low abundance. Major sources for the emission of vanadium in the environment include combustion of fuel oils, dye, ceramics, ink, catalyst and steel manufacturing. Vanadium in trace amounts represents an essential element for normal cell growth, but it can be toxic when present in higher concentrations. It plays an important role in physiological systems including normalization of sugar levels and participation in various enzyme systems as an inhibitor and cofactor of the oxidation of amines.1 Schiff base has been studied extensively because of their high – potential chemical permutation. Schiff base bases represent a class of important compounds in a medicinal and pharmaceutical field. They have biological activities such as antimicrobial,2‒5 anticancer6‒8 antifungal9,10 and herbicidal activities.11 More so, Schiff base offer more opportunities for inducing substrate chirality, tuning metals centred electronic factors, enhance solubilities and stability of either homogeneous or hetrogenous catalyst.12‒17 Schiff base ligands are able to coordinate many different metals18‒20 and stabilize their oxidation states. A good number of reviews have been made on the use of large number of chromogenic reagents for the spectrophotometric determination of iron and cobalt. Some of the recently proposed spectrophotometric methods for the determination of iron21‒24 are less sensitive and less selective. We are now proposing simple, sensitive and selective direct and derivative spectrophotometric methods for the determination of vanadium(III) and vanadium(V) in various complex materials using 2-[(E)-[3-[(E)-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)methyleneamino]phenyl]iminomethyl]phenol synthesized from the condensation reaction of 1,3-diaminobenzene and 2-hydroxyzaldehyde as chromogenic agent.
All the reagents, O - phenylenediamine (Sigma Aldrich), 2 Hydroxylbenzylaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich), Concentrated Hydrochloric Acid (Sigma Aldrich), Ethanol (May and Baker), Ammonium trioxovanadate(V) (Sigma Aldrich), Vanadium (III) chloride (Sigma Aldrich) were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. Distilled water was used to prepare some solutions. Buffer solutions used covering the pH range 1-13 was prepared according to Clark and Lubbs’ Procedure25 All absorbance measurements and the spectra of Schiff base and the metal complexes solution were taken at 30°C with a double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1800). Measurements of pH were made using control digital pH meter equipped with a combination electrode.
Synthesis of the Ligand
Synthesis of the Schiff base ligand was carried out according to reported method.26 5.41 g of (0.05 mole) of O - phenylenediamine was dissolved in dimethyl formamide (50 cm3) and 2 cm3 of 1.0 M NaOH was added and stirred. 10.44 g (0.1mole) of 2-hydroxy benzaldehyde was added to the resulting solution at room temperature. The mixture was refluxed for 2 hour at 60-650C. The Schiff base was cooled, washed with ethanol, recrystallized and kept in a desiccator over fused CaCl2. (91% yield, m.p. 112- 115oC) Figure 1.
Synthesis of the metal complexes
The vanadium(III) and vanadium(V) complexes of 2-[(E)-[3-[(E)-(2-hydroxyphenyl)methyleneamino]phenyl]iminomethyl]phenol (HPMAPIP) were synthesized according to literature.27 In each case, a solution of the ligand 1.898 g (0.003 M) in ethanolic solution (25 cm3) was reacted with 0.500 g (0.00015 mole) solution of vanadium (III) and 0.350 g of vanadium (V) in ethanol (25 cm3). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 2 hour at 60o-65oC. There was observable color change. The mixture was then cooled, the product formed collected, washed with absolute ethanol, recrystallised, dried and kept in desiccator over fused CaCl2.
Preparation of alloy steel sample solution
5 g of the alloy sample was dissolved in a mixture of 2 M HCl and 10 M HNO3. The resulting solution was evaporated to a small volume. To this, 5 cm3 of 1 : 1 H2O and H2SO4 mixture was added and evaporated to dryness. The residue was dissolved in 15 cm3 of distilled water and filtered through Whatman filter paper no. 40. The filtrate was collected in a 100 cm3 volumetric flask and made upto the mark with distilled water. The solution was further diluted as required.
Vanadium(III) and vanadium(V) react with HPMAPIP forming Greenish- yellow and Orange- green complexes respectively. The colour of the complexes was stable. The texture of the complexes is powdery in nature and the percentage yield were higher and in tandem with literatures.
Direct method of determination of vanadium(III) and vanadium(V) complexes
The absorption spectrum of [V(III)- HPMAPIP] and [V(V)- HPMAPIP] shows maximum absorbance at 405 nm and 399 nm respectively. This is slightly higher from the value given in literature.28 The composition of the complex [V(III): HPMAPIP] and [V(V): HPMAPIP] were determined as 1 : 1 by Slope ratio method. The optimization investigations indicate that the absorbance of the complexes were maximum and stable in pH range of 10 and 11 respectively Figure (2 & 3). Hence these pH’s were chosen for further studies. The calibration curve of V(III) shows a good linear relationship. A straight line graph passing through the origin was obtained for the complex, indicating that spectrophotometric analysis of complex on donor- acceptor complex formation can be used for quantitative analysis of V(III) complex Figure 4. Beer’s law was obeyed from 0.488ppm to 3.904ppm with r2 =0.9733 indicating a good linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. The plot is shown in Figure 5. While the calibration curve of V(V) complex shows adherence to Beer’s law over the concentration range of 0.488–3.904 ppm with r2 =0.9801 indicating a good linear relationship between absorbance and concentration. The linearity of the plot suggests that it can obey Beer’s law at concentrations beyond 3.904 ppm. The plot is shown in Figure 6. Variable amounts of V(III) and V(V) were treated with suitable amounts of reagent and buffer and the validity of Beer's law was tested by plotting the measured absorbance values of the prepared solutions against concentrations of V(III) and V(V). Other analytical results are presented in Table 1, 2 & 3.
Compound |
Colour |
Texture |
Yield (gram |
% Yield |
Composition Temperature (oC) |
Molar Conductivity (μ Scm-1) |
Remark |
HPMAPIP |
Orange |
Crystalline |
12.3 |
78 |
112-115 |
14.6 |
Non Electrolyte |
V(III)- HPMAPIP |
Greenish- yellow |
Powdery |
0.905 |
38 |
250-252 |
18.8 |
Non Electrolyte |
V(V)- HPMAPIP |
Orange- green |
Powdery |
0.833 |
37 |
240-242 |
47.8 |
Non Electrolyte |
CuSO4.5H2O |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
570 |
Electrolyte |
Table 1 Physical Characteristic and Molar Conductivity Data of the Ligand and its metal Complex
Compound |
Water |
Methanol |
Ethanol |
Acetone |
DMF |
HPMAPIP |
SS |
S |
S |
SS |
S |
V(III)- HPMAPIP |
S |
S |
S |
SS |
S |
V(V)- HPMAPIP |
S |
S |
S |
SS |
S |
Table 2 Solubility of the Schiff Base and its Complexes in Various Solvents
NS = Not Soluble, SS = Slightly Soluble, S = Soluble
Characteristics |
V(III) complex |
V(V) complex |
ƛ (nm) |
405 |
399 |
Molar absorptivity (Lmol -1cm-1 |
4955.69 |
3924.05 |
Calibration sensitivity; m (ppm) |
0.074 |
0.024 |
Analytical sensitivity; m/SA |
0.32 |
24 |
Limit of Detection; 3SA |
0.69 |
0.003 |
Limit of Quantification; CQ; 1OSA(ppm) |
2.3 |
0.01 |
Linear dynamic range (ppm) |
0.488 - 3.904 |
0.488 – 3.904 |
Table 3 Analytical Characteristics of the metal complexes
SA = Standard Deviation of the blank: ±0.23 ±0.001
Optimization of conditions
Effect of pH on the absorbance of the complexes
The plot of absorbance against pH gave the highest absorbance of 0.214 for the formation of V(III) complex which was obtained at pH 10.0.
Effect of the concentration of the reagent on formation of vanadium(III) complex
The maximum absorption was obtained with 1.0 x 10-4 M
The highest absorbance obtained is 1.0×10-4M for all the metal complexes.
Infrared spectral data of 2-[(E)-[3-[(E)-(2-hydroxyphenyl)methyleneamino]phenyl] iminomethyl]phenol (HPMAPIP) V(III) and V(V) metal complexes
One significant feature of the IR spectra of the ligand and its V(III) and V(V) complex is the appearance of broad band between 3400 and 3420.8 cm-1. This has been ascribed to the presence of molecular hydrogen bonding. The absence of absorption band in the 3509-3310cm-1 and 1740 – 1695cm-1 region of the spectrum assignable to N-H vibration of the amines and C=O of the salicyaldehyde from the reactant respectively provide a strong evidence for the formation of ligand. The ligand showed vibration due to C-H of aromatic of medium intensity at 3056cm-1, which shifted to higher intensity at 3061cm -1 in both V(III) and V(V) complexes. This is in conformity with the values given by literature.31 The C=N stretching vibration appeared at 1615 cm-1 in ligand and shifted to 1596 cm-1 in V(III) complex and 1602 cm-1 in V(V) complex. The decrease in frequency in both complexes suggests coordination of the azomethine nitrogen to the metal centres. This is also supported by the emergence of new bands at 495-448 cm-1 assignable to v(M-N).
The C-O stretching vibration was observed in the ligand at 1276-1107 cm-1 in both complexes, shifted to higher frequency which suggests that the phenolic oxygen was coordinated to the metal centres after deprotonation. This assertion agrees with what has been documented for other complexes in literature of diamino benzene complex,29-31
The presence of bands at 547-544 cm-1 was due to v(M-O) in both complexes further supports coordination of the phenolic oxygen to the metal centre. In the I.R spectra of the ligand and complexes, bands assignable to C-H aromatic stretching deformation, even ring breathing and out of plane vibration were observed to have weak, strong and moderate bands. The IR data of the ligand and complexes generally imply that the HPMAPIP is bidentate coordinating through N and O.
Proton(1H) NMR assignment for 2-[(E)-[3-[(E)-(2-hydroxyphenyl)methyleneamino] phenyl]iminomethyl]phenol (HPMAPIP)
The proton magnetic spectral of the ligand display a singlet peak at 8.85 ppm and integrated to two protons is the signal of hydroxyl protons attached to the aromatic ring. At 7.6 ppm, the singlet peak integrated for two protons is due to the azomethine protons Figure 7. The peak appearing at 7.4 ppm may be due to the non-equivalent aromatic proton. The aromatic proton is deshielded by the two azomethine nitrogens attached to the same ring. The doublet around 7.2 ppm and integrated for two protons is assigned to the symmetric phenyl proton. More so, the multiplet peaks around 6.9 ppm is integrated for eight protons. This arises from the symmetric aromatic protons of the phenyl group. It can be deduced from the proton magnetic resonance spectral that the ligand is symmetrical with some functional group N=C-H and Ar-OH appearing in both sides.Following the result of a 1:1 stoichiometry of the metal to ligand and its spectral data, it reveal that coordination of the metal to the ligand takes place through two azomethine N and two phenolato oxygen atoms in each of the metal complexes after deprotonation, giving a square planar geometry of the complexe in Figure 8.
Calibration Plots-Beer’s law of V(III) and V(V) complexes
Effect of some interfering ions on the determination of V(III) and V(V) Complexes
Under optimum conditions of the procedure, the selectivity of the proposed method was investigated by the determination of a fixed amount of V(III) and V(V) (1.2 ppm) in the presence of a series of cations that could as well form similar complex with HPMAPIP Table 4. These ions were chosen due to their occurrence in alloys in which vanadium III and V were also present. The absorbance was compared with the absorbance of the complex in the absence of foreign ion and percentage interference calculated. The limiting value of concentration of the foreign ion was taken as that which caused an error in the absorbance corresponding to twice the standard deviation of the absorbance of the V(III)- HPMAPIP or V(V)- HPMAPIP complexes Figure 9. The results are summarized in Table 5 and 6. In the determination of V(III)- HPMAPIP complex, the mean absorbance obtained for six determinations was 0.138±0.051. The tolerance limit was set as the amount of foreign ion causing an error of ±10.2 % in the absorbance of V(III)- HPMAPIP complex. The result of the interference study show that Mg(II), Fe(III), Cu(II), Ca(II) and Cr(III) interference seriously in the determination of V(III) complex and Ca(II) could be tolerable below 0.3 ppm. The interference of these ions were checked by masking and/or pre-extraction (where applicable) in the direct determination of V(III) in various alloys. KCN was used to enhance selectivity and for the pre-extraction of Fe(III) in steel.
Ligand |
V(III) Complex |
V(V) Complex |
Band Assignment |
3411 (w) |
3400.0(m) |
3420.87(m) |
v(O-H) |
3056 (m) |
3061.13(w) |
3061.13(w) |
v(C-H) of Aromatic |
2919 (w) |
2929.00(w) |
2929.04(w) |
Aromatic overtones & combination bend |
2381.20(w) |
2381.20(w) |
||
1615.44( s) |
1596.15(s) |
1602.90(s) |
v(C=N) |
1479.45(m) |
1452.45(m) |
1452.45(m) |
v(C=C) |
1275.97(s) |
1312.60(s) |
1312.60(s) |
v(C-O) |
1107.18(w) |
1144.79(m) |
1141.90(w) |
v(C-O) |
901.75(m) |
980.84(m) |
982.76(m) |
v(C-H) Out of plane C-H Bending |
932.6(w) |
|||
754.19(s) |
756.12(s) |
754.19(s) |
v(C-H) out of plane |
640.39(w) |
635.57(w) |
621.10(w) |
v(=C-H) deformation |
543.77(w) |
546.84(m) |
M – O bending |
|
494.98(w) |
447.50(w) |
M - N (ring breathing) |
Table 4 IR bands of ligand and its V(III) and V(V) complexes
Legend: S=strong, m=medium, w= weak, br = broad
Signal ppm |
Assignment |
8.85 ppm (2H,s) |
SymAr – OH hydroxyl protons |
7.6 ppm (2H,s) |
Sym, HC=N, azomethine protons |
7.4 ppm (1H,d) |
Ar-H, aromatic proton |
7.2 ppm (2H,d) |
Phenyl proton. |
6.98 ppm (8H,m) |
Sym.Ar-H aromatic protons of the phenyl. |
Table 5 1H NMR spectral Data of the HPMAPIP in CDCl3 solvent
Ions Added |
Concentration (ppm) |
Absorbance |
Interference level (%) |
Mg2+ Added as MgO |
0.5 |
0.184 |
33.3 |
0.8 |
0.18 |
30.4 |
|
1.1 |
0.207 |
50 |
|
1.2 |
0.218 |
58 |
|
1.5 |
0.244 |
77 |
|
1.15 |
0.268 |
94.2 |
|
2.2 |
0.215 |
55 |
|
Fe3+ added as Fecl3 |
0.5 |
0.181 |
31.2 |
0.8 |
0.223 |
61.5 |
|
1 |
0.23 |
67 |
|
1.2 |
0.266 |
93.1 |
|
1.5 |
0.286 |
107.2 |
|
1.9 |
0.165 |
19.7 |
|
2.3 |
0.312 |
126.1 |
|
Cu2+ added as CuSO4.5H2O |
0.4 |
0.261 |
89.1 |
0.75 |
0.215 |
55.7 |
|
0.9 |
0.293 |
112.3 |
|
1 |
0.336 |
143.5 |
|
1.32 |
0.33 |
139.1 |
|
1.64 |
0.341 |
147.1 |
|
1.93 |
0.363 |
163 |
|
Ca2+ added as CaSO4 |
0.3 |
0.157 |
13.8 |
0.5 |
0.163 |
18.1 |
|
0.8 |
0.158 |
14.5 |
|
1 |
0.159 |
15.2 |
|
1.3 |
0.17 |
23.2 |
|
1.5 |
0.164 |
18.8 |
|
1.9 |
0.172 |
24.6 |
|
Cr3+ added as Cr(NO3)3.9H2O |
0.6 |
0.141 |
2.2 |
0.7 |
0.158 |
14.5 |
|
1 |
0.166 |
20.3 |
|
1.15 |
0.169 |
22.5 |
|
1.5 |
0.194 |
40.6 |
|
1.7 |
0.209 |
51.4 |
|
2 |
0.22 |
59.4 |
|
Al3+ |
0.5 |
0.19 |
37.7 |
0.8 |
0.17 |
23.2 |
|
1.1 |
0.174 |
26.1 |
|
1.38 |
0.16 |
15.9 |
|
1.5 |
0.179 |
29.7 |
|
1.8 |
0.174 |
26.1 |
|
2.1 |
0.152 |
10.1 |
Table 6 Effect of some Interfering Ions on V (III) Complex
V (V) complex
1.20 ppm V(V) ion was determined in the absence of foreign ions. The mean absorbance for four determinations was 0.167 ±0.074. The tolerance limit was taken as the concentration of foreign ion causing an interference of ± 14.8% in the V(V) complex. The interference levels in the determination of 1.20 ppm V(V) ion with various proportions of foreign ions are shown in Table 7 In the Table 7, the main interferences in the determination of V(V) ion are Fe(III), Cr(III), Ca(II), Al(III) and Cu(II) ions. Their interference levels were not within ±14.8%. The interference of Fe ion can be eliminated by masking with potassium cyanide.
Ions Added |
Concentration (ppm) |
Absorbance |
Interference level (%) |
Mg2+ Added as MgO |
0.3 |
0.163 |
6 |
0.5 |
0.184 |
10 |
|
0.7 |
0.201 |
20 |
|
0.96 |
0.196 |
17.4 |
|
1.2 |
0.198 |
18.6 |
|
1.6 |
0.186 |
11.4 |
|
2 |
0.168 |
0.6 |
|
Fe3+ added as Fecl3 |
0.5 |
0.233 |
39.5 |
0.8 |
0.189 |
13.2 |
|
1 |
0.213 |
27.5 |
|
1.2 |
0.173 |
3.6 |
|
1.5 |
0.204 |
22.2 |
|
1.9 |
0.172 |
3 |
|
2.3 |
0.176 |
5.4 |
|
Cu2+ added as CuSO4.5H2O |
0.4 |
0.238 |
42.5 |
0.75 |
0.207 |
24.1 |
|
0.9 |
0.214 |
28.1 |
|
1 |
0.23 |
38 |
|
1.32 |
0.21 |
26 |
|
1.64 |
0.177’ |
6.1 |
|
1.93 |
0.153 |
8.4 |
|
Ca2+ added as CaSO4 |
0.3 |
0.265 |
59.1 |
0.5 |
0.247 |
48 |
|
0.8 |
0.274 |
64 |
|
1 |
0.33 |
98 |
|
1.3 |
0.229 |
37.1 |
|
1.5 |
0.25 |
50.1 |
|
1.9 |
0.271 |
62.3 |
|
Cr3+ added as Cr(NO3)3.9H2O |
0.6 |
0.119 |
19.2 |
0.7 |
0.222 |
33 |
|
1 |
0.21 |
26 |
|
1.15 |
0.213 |
28 |
|
1.5 |
0.237 |
42 |
|
1.7 |
0.213 |
38 |
|
2 |
0.221 |
32.3 |
|
Al3+ |
0.5 |
0.205 |
23.1 |
0.8 |
0.123 |
26.3 |
|
1.1 |
0.166 |
0.6 |
|
1.38 |
0.158 |
5.4 |
|
1.5 |
0.146 |
12.6 |
|
1.8 |
0.17 |
2 |
|
2.1 |
0.177 |
6 |
Table 7 Effect of some Interfering Ions on V(V) Complex
Application to the analysis of alloys
An aliquot of the solutions of various alloys already analyzed by flame AAS was taken and the content of V(III) and V(V) complexes and each case determined spectrophotometrically, under the prevailing conditions according to the general procedure. The concentration of the V(III) and V(V) was extrapolated from the calibration curve.
Table 8 and 9 summarizes the results obtained for the determination of V(III) and V(V) in alloys with HPMAPIP. The above results show that the direct determination of V(III) and V(V) in Steel gave a very good recovery at concentrations above 0.064 ppm. It appears that a prior separation of V(III) before determination in steel is necessary. The ability of the method to determine small amounts of V(III) and V(V) has been testified and tells more about its sensitivity advantage over the flame atomic spectrophotometric method (which of cause is not able to quantify the actual amount of various vanadium ions present in the samples. Therefore, no firm quantitative comparison of the selectivity of the present method is possible with AAS due to differences in the methods used for their assessment.
Sample |
Amount added (ppm) |
Amount found (ppm) |
Recovery (%) |
RSD (%) |
Steel I |
0.068 |
0.064 |
94 |
± 0.20 |
Steel II |
0.085 |
0.08 |
95.5 |
± 0.17 |
Steel III |
0.102 |
0.097 |
96 |
± 0.40 |
Table 8 Determination of V(III) in Steel with the reagent/UV-Vis spectrophotometry
Sample |
Amount added (ppm) |
Amount found (ppm) |
Recovery (%) |
RSD (%) |
Steel I |
0.068 |
0.061 |
90 |
± 1.74 |
Steel II |
0.085 |
0.079 |
93 |
± 0.88 |
Steel III |
0.102 |
0.097 |
95.5 |
± 1.53 |
Table 9 Determination of V(V) with the reagent/ UV- Vis spectrophotometry
The applicability of the proposed method was evaluated by its application to the direct determination of V(III) and (V) ion on steel alloy, previously analyzed by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The results of determination of vanadium in steel with Flame AAS, determination of V(III) in Steel with the reagent/UV-, Vis spectrophotometry determination of V(V) with the Reagent/ UV- Vis spectrophotometry respectively indicate that the proposed method proposed method of determination of vanadium is more sensitive than those reported by Malik and Rao32, Patil and Dhuley33 Nagabhushana et al.34 Wang et al.35 Zhang et al.36 and can be used to determine vanadium metal ions in various alloys without extracting procedures. The proposed method has been prove to be promising in the determination of V(III) and V(V) ions and could be applied to several simple and complex sample. It is rapid, selective and sensitive. Above all most of the reported methods involve extraction into spurious organic solvents where as the present methods are simple, non extractive, and reasonably accurate.
©2021 Okenwa, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.